Rājadhamma-kaṇḍa — On the Duties of a King
Dhamma Nīti · 18 verses with translation and explanation
266. The Ten Royal Duties (Dasavidha-rājadhamma)
ทานํ สีลํ ปริจฺจาคํ อชฺชวํ มทฺทวํ ตปํ อโกธํ อวิหึสญฺจ ขนฺตี จ อวิโรธนํ ทเสเต ธมฺเม ราชาโน อปฺปมตฺเตน ธาเรยฺยุํ ฯ
Giving (dāna), moral conduct (sīla), self-sacrifice, uprightness, gentleness, austerity (tapa), non-anger, non-harming, patience, and non-opposition — these ten royal duties (dasavidha-rājadhamma) a king should uphold with heedfulness.
The ten royal duties begin with giving and moral conduct, which form the foundation of generosity and moral authority. Self-sacrifice is renunciation for the sake of the people. Uprightness and gentleness guarantee sincerity and approachability. Austerity is self-mastery. Non-anger, non-harming, patience, and non-opposition are the peaceful virtues that guard against tyranny. A king must uphold these with heedfulness, for they are the virtues that turn power from a curse into a blessing upon the land.
267. The Four Bases of Sympathy (Saṅgahavatthu)
ทานํ อตฺถจริยา ปิยวาจา อตฺตสมํ ปิ จ สงฺคหา จตุโร อิเม มุนินฺเทน ปกาสิตา ฯ
Giving (dāna), beneficial conduct (atthacariyā), kindly speech (piyavācā), and treating others as one's equal with constancy (samānattatā) — these four bases of sympathy (saṅgahavatthu) were proclaimed by the Lord of Sages.
Giving wins hearts through material support. Beneficial conduct is offering help and service. Kindly speech uses words that are compassionate, truthful, and unifying. Constancy is treating others as one's equal, consistently and fairly. For a king, these are not mere kindnesses but a science of governance: the means of uniting the hearts of the people, building loyalty, and forming a harmonious society in which people feel seen, supported, and respected by their ruler.
268. The Fear That Denies Happiness
วเน มิคา น ลภนฺติ มหาภยา นิทฺทาสุขํ ราชาโน ปิ น ลภนฺติ อุตฺตรถามภีตโต สํสารภยภีเตน น รมนฺติ เย ปณฺฑิตา ฯ
Deer in the forest, because of great danger, find no happiness in sleep. Kings too find no such happiness, out of fear of those more powerful. And the wise, out of fear of the peril of saṃsāra, take no delight in sensual pleasures.
Deer in the forest are prey, and so live in constant wariness. A king lives in fear of rivals, rebels, or those more powerful than himself. But the most telling comparison is with the wise, who fear the peril of saṃsāra — the endless round of birth, aging, suffering, and death. This fear does not paralyze; it spurs the search for liberation. The king's insecurity is thus set beside the spiritual urgency of the seeker: both rest upon a correct understanding of danger.
269. The Virtues of a Leader
ขมา ชาคริยุฏฺฐานํ สํวิภาโค ทยิกฺขณา นายกสฺส คุณา เอเต อิจฺฉิตพฺพา หิตตฺถิโน ฯ
Forbearing patience, vigilant wakefulness, exertion, sharing, compassion, and discerning observation — these virtues of a leader should be desired by one who seeks the welfare of the people.
Vigilance is watchfulness against danger and heedlessness. Exertion is diligent effort. Sharing is generosity with both wealth and credit. Compassion is kindness toward those who suffer. Observation is the discernment to understand situations and people correctly. Together these form the character of a ruler who is strong, generous, compassionate, and perceptive — a leader who genuinely seeks the welfare of those he governs.
270. The Middle Way in Governance
ปริภูโต มุทุ โหติ อติติกฺโข จ เวรวา เอตญฺจ อุภยํ ญตฺวา อนุมชฺฌํ สมาจเร ฯ
One who is too soft is despised; one who is too harsh makes enemies. Knowing both of these, one should conduct oneself by the middle way.
If a king is too soft, he is despised and the law is flouted. If he is too harsh, he is feared like an enemy and invites rebellion. Neither extreme of softness nor of harshness can establish true greatness. The wise king must therefore avoid both, applying measured firmness only when necessary and mercy when fitting. This is the Middle Way applied to governance: knowing both extremes, and then acting at the right time without going to either.
271. Both Softness and Firmness Are Needed
เนกนฺตมุทุนา สกฺกา เอกนฺตติขิเณน วา มหตฺเต ฐปิตุํ อตฺตํ ตสฺมา อุภยมาจเร ฯ
One cannot establish oneself in greatness by softness alone, nor by harshness alone. Therefore one should practise both.
A king cannot attain true greatness by clinging to softness alone. Unwavering gentleness, though kind, invites contempt, opportunism, and disorder; people cease to respect or obey. Conversely, sheer harshness breeds only fear, resentment, and rebellion; people resist rather than follow. Neither extreme by itself can establish lasting power or respect. The wise leader cultivates the discernment to be gentle when it works and firm when it is needed. This is not inconsistency but contextual mastery.
272–273. A Realm Prospers Through a Strong Populace
กสฺสโก วาณิโช มจฺโจ สมโณ สุตสีลวา เตสุ วิปุลชาเตสุ รฏฺฐํ ปิ วิปุลํ สิยา เตสุ ทุพฺพลชาเตสุ รฏฺฐํ ปิ ทุพฺพลํ สิยา สรฏฺฐํ วิปุลํ ตสฺมา ธาเรยฺย รฏฺฐภารวา ฯ
Farmers, merchants, ministers, ascetics, and those endowed with learning and virtue — when these become many and prosperous, the realm too becomes prosperous; when these become weak, the realm too becomes weak. Therefore, one who bears the burden of the state should foster the realm's prosperity.
A king does not create prosperity alone; he depends on the strength of these fundamental pillars — farmers, merchants, ministers, ascetics, and those of learning and virtue. When these groups are many and prosperous, thriving in their duties, the whole realm flourishes. Conversely, if they are weak or oppressed, the realm grows weak. The ruler's primary duty, therefore, is not to extract from these groups but to actively foster their prosperity, shaping policy and upholding a justice that lets them thrive.
274–275. Unjust Rule Is Like Cutting Unripe Fruit
มหารุกฺขสฺส ผลิโน อามํ ฉินฺทติ โย ผลํ รสญฺจสฺส น ชานาติ พีชญฺจสฺส วินสฺสติ มหารุกฺขูปมํ รฏฺฐํ อธมฺเมน ปสาสติ รสญฺจสฺส น ชานาติ รฏฺฐญฺจาปิ วินสฺสติ ฯ
Just as one who cuts the unripe fruit from a great fruiting tree neither knows its true taste, and its seed is destroyed — so one who rules a realm, which is like a great tree, unjustly, neither knows its true taste, and the realm too is destroyed.
A king who rules unjustly is like a fool who cuts unripe fruit from a great tree: his action is premature and destructive. Such a king never comes to know the true essence of the realm — the prosperity and happiness that a ripe, well-governed realm yields. The "seed" stands for the future: dynastic continuity, the legacy of rule, and the potential for future growth. Unjust rule thus does twofold harm: it robs the goodness of the present and destroys the future that might have carried on.
276–277. Just Rule Is Like Gathering Ripe Fruit
มหารุกฺขสฺส ผลิโน ปกฺกํ ฉินฺทติ โย ผลํ รสญฺจสฺส วิชานาติ พีชญฺจสฺส น นสฺสติ มหารุกฺขูปมํ รฏฺฐํ ธมฺเมน โย ปสาสติ รสญฺจสฺส วิชานาติ รฏฺฐญฺจาปิ น นสฺสติ ฯ
Just as one who gathers the ripe fruit from a great fruiting tree knows its true taste, and its seed is not destroyed — so one who rules a realm, which is like a great tree, justly, knows its true taste, and the realm too is not destroyed.
A king who rules justly is like a wise man who waits patiently and gathers only ripe fruit. Such a king truly comes to know the essence of the realm — he tastes the true reward of kingship: a realm that is stable, prosperous, and harmonious, where Dhamma pervades. Moreover, by acting with justice and foresight, he preserves the "seed": future stability, the loyalty of the people, and rightful succession left undestroyed. Just rule is thus both cultivation and preservation, ensuring welfare both in the present and for generations to come.
278–279. Under an Unjust King, the Nobles Turn Against Him
โย จ ราชา ชนปทํ อธมฺเมน ปสาสติ สพฺโพสธีหิ โส ราชา วิรุทฺโธ โหติ ขตฺติโย ตเถว เนคเม หึสํ เย ยุตฺตา กยวิกฺกเย โอชทานพลีกาเร ส โกเสน วิรุชฺฌติ ฯ
A king who rules his realm unjustly, and lets the town merchants oppress others in trade, who taxes and levies forced labour oppressively — that king (of the warrior class) comes to be opposed by every means, and turns against his own treasury.
The king who rules unjustly here does not merely stand by amid injustice; he actively commits or permits economic oppression. This includes letting merchants exploit others in trade — through price-gouging or monopoly that harms the people — as well as levying taxes and forced labour unjustly. When a king fails in his duty to protect the people from exploitation, he betrays the very purpose of kingship. The nobility, as guardians of the social order, turn against him by every means.
280. Harm the Skilled Generals, and the Army Turns Against Him
ปหารวรเขตฺตญฺญู สงฺคาเม กตนิสฺสเม อุสฺสิเต หึสยํ ราชา ส พเลน วิรุชฺฌติ ฯ
A king who, when war breaks out, instead harms those who know the terrain and are skilled in battle, comes to be opposed by his own army.
If, in a time of war or unrest, a king harms his most capable soldiers — especially those who know the terrain and are skilled in battle — it is a grave error, for these are the very men upon whom his power and security depend. To act toward one's finest protectors with ingratitude, envy, or cruelty is to cut off one's most vital support. His greatest strength becomes his greatest enemy, guaranteeing defeat by the very force that ought to have defended him.
281. Harm the Ascetic Sages, and Heaven Turns Against Him
ตเถว อิสโย หึสํ สํยเม พฺรหฺมจาริโย อธมฺมจารี ขตฺติโย ส สคฺเคน วิรุชฺฌติ ฯ
Likewise, a king of unjust conduct who harms the sages, restrained and living the holy life, comes to be opposed by heaven.
If an unjust king uses his power to harm the sages who are restrained and live the holy life, it is a violation of a sacred trust. Such persons embody the moral and spiritual conscience of the realm; their welfare is seen as bound to the blessing of heaven. A king who harms them is therefore opposed by heaven itself — losing all favour from above. His action brings about the direst consequences, and he forfeits the moral legitimacy that upholds his rule. His transgression is of a cosmic order, ensuring his ultimate ruin.
282. A King Is the Author of His Own Reign
สยํ กตา น ปเรน มหานชฺโช ชุวงฺกตา อิสฺสเรน ตถา รญฺญา สรฏฺเฐ อธิปจฺจตฺตา ฯ
Just as a great river runs straight or crooked by its own nature, not made so by another, so too is a king, sovereign by his own power within his realm.
Just as the course of a great river, whether straight or crooked, is determined by its own nature and flow rather than by any outside force, so a king's sovereignty and the quality of his rule are shaped by his own power and choices. Virtue or vice, success or failure — all are self-made. The realm responds to his will and character as the land responds to water. This is both an empowerment and a solemn warning: the king is the architect of his own reign.
283. The Chain of Accountability
ปุตฺโต ปาปํ กโต มาตา สิสฺโส ปาปํ กโต ครุ นาคเรหิ กโต ราชา ราชํ ปาปํ ปุโรหิโต ฯ
A mother is blamed for the wrong done by her son; a teacher for the wrong done by his pupil; a king for what the townsfolk do; and the royal chaplain for the wrong done by the king.
A mother bears responsibility for her son's wrongdoing; a teacher answers for his pupil's faults. By this same logic, a king answers for the wrongdoing of the townsfolk: their decline and suffering reflect his failure to rule justly. Moreover, the royal chaplain (purohita, the religious adviser) answers for the moral and ritual shortcomings of the king himself. This forms a hierarchy of accountability — spiritual leader, king, people — underscoring that leaders at every level bear a social burden for the conduct of those in their charge.
284. A King Shares in the Merit and Demerit of His People
ปุญฺญาปุญฺญํ กโรนฺเตสุ ฉภาโค เอกเทสกํ ราชา ลภติ สพฺเพหิ ตสฺมา ปาปานิ วารเย ปุญฺญเมว ปวฑฺเฒนฺโต ชนกายํ ปสาสเย ฯ
Among those who do merit and demerit, a king receives a one-sixth share from all. Therefore he should restrain evil, foster only merit, and so govern the people.
It is said that a king receives a one-sixth share of the merit and demerit generated by every one of his subjects, making the moral health of the people a matter of direct personal concern. His duty, therefore, cannot be passive: he must actively restrain evil and foster merit. His own destiny is bound up with the ethical climate of the realm. Ruling justly is thus at once an act of the highest self-interest and of the common good.
285. Duties Toward the People and Toward Other Kings
พาลสฺส ชีวิตํ อปฺปํ ปณฺฑิตสฺส พหุตรํ ชนกายสฺส ราชา ว ราชธมฺโม ว ราชุนํ ฯ
A king has duties toward the people and toward other kings (other realms). The life of a foolish king is short; the life of a wise king is far longer.
The life of a foolish king is short, because by neglecting his duties toward the people and toward other kings he breeds turmoil and opposition. The life of a wise king is far longer, because he fulfils these duties completely. This points to a code of conduct both toward the people he governs and toward other kings and realms, grounded in the virtues of justice, honesty, and non-aggression. Wisdom extends one's influence in both personal and political spheres, and leads to a longer life and wider influence.
286. Defective Leadership Leads to Ruin
อนายกา วินสฺสนฺติ นสฺสนฺติ พหุนายกา ถีนายกา วินสฺสนฺติ นสฺสนฺติ สุสุนายกา ฯ
A group without a leader perishes; a group with many leaders (in conflict) perishes; a group with a woman as leader (by the ancient view) perishes; a group with a leader still too young perishes.
A group without a leader falls into disorder. One with many leaders suffers conflicting commands and factionalism. One with a woman as leader, ancient tradition held to be weak. One with a leader still too young lacks experience and maturity. The ideal implied is a single mature leader, wise and virtuous. The quality, unity, and fitness of leadership are decisive factors for any group, especially a realm. (The point about a female leader is an ancient traditional view, not a fact, and should be read with an understanding of its historical context.)
287. The King Is the Nurturer of His People
กจฺฉปีนญฺจ มจฺฉีนํ กุกฺกุฏีนญฺจ เธนุนํ ปุตฺตโปโส ยถา โหติ ตถา มจฺเจสุ ราชุนํ ฯ
Just as the turtle, the fish, the hen, and the cow nurture their young, so does a king nurture his people.
Just as the mother turtle, fish, hen, and cow naturally nurture and protect their young, so it is the natural duty of a king to nurture his people. The king is the father and mother of all his subjects. This nurturing includes protection from external enemies and internal crime, provision in times of famine, and the creation of conditions for growth and prosperity. A king's power is thus legitimated not by conquest but by this caring, parental duty.
End of Rājadhamma-kaṇḍa (On the Duties of a King), verses 266–287, comprising 22 gāthās.